Therefore, as demonstrated in the facts above, in these two decades, Eni was never willing to have a “ friendly conversation” and now, unlike what Eni claims to NCP Brazil, there is no “ good faith”, nor “ active participation”, much less “ full cooperation” in the work developed by NCP Brazil. So, why would Eni have a different behavior in 2022 during the Good Offices offered by NCP Brazil in the context of OECD Guidelines for Multinacional Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct? And that's because, if Eni had not participated in this mediation procedure, the company knew that the second lawsuit against me would be filed under the new Italian legislation, causing Eni to suffer a new defeat in the Italian Courts. 08), the company's participation was “only” to fulfill a “ordinance” of the magistrate of the Civil Court of Rome, “imposed” on Eni at the hearing on Octo( Doc. Now, on June 3, 2020, when Eni's lawyers met with my lawyer, at the “ Rome Mediation Agency” ( Doc. The words of this critical shareholder are immortalized in the minutes of the 2018 AGM ( Doc. However, even after putting himself as our “ mediator”, Eni never accepted to participate in a “ mediation meeting” to try to put an end to our story. Meggiolaro, using the microphone, spoke about the “Flinto case” with all the members of the Board of Directors present at Eni's corporate auditorium in Rome. Mauro Meggiolaro, a journalist and “critical shareholder” of Eni, took my case to be discussed in four Shareholders' Meetings ( AGM), in the years 2017, 2018, 2020, and 2021. Despite being insistent, #Eni never responded to my contacts! 02), I made contact with five different Boards of Directors and three different CEOs: Mr. 01) and the Ethics Committee in Brazil (2002 - Doc. In addition to the presidency of AGIP Brazil (2001 - Doc. In all these more than 21 long years, I wait to speak with representatives of the Eni.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |